scotus closed one door but left many doors open such they can’t be closed as scotus said so. could be great thing if done right. in the en banc, the positive is that judges understand what is going on and appear to be favorable to the plaintiffs which should play out well in district court. govt lawyers were averse to district court meaning must be a good thing. treasury lawyer rightly points out that the prior administration did little and even increased liquidation preference and thus the letter did not help as much but left the door ajar.
This is a nice feel good comment but feel good comments have put zero in my pocket. Are we expecting some sort of decision on this one at some point? Or did it just get referred to yet another court? I lose track with all the suits and my way to busy work life.