Let’s parse this…
“But there is nothing to suggest this is so or not so
> In other words, it IS possible the company is in a quiet period. There is no evidence which suggests the company is NOT in a quiet period
“The simple fact is the company has nothing to report.”
> If you have proof of this statement, then you’ve just refuted the above statement, because that would mean there IS something to suggest the company isn’t in a quiet period.
“…and are (or should be) advised to keep public statements to a minimum…”
> Hasn’t the allegation consistently been that CYDY management doesn’t know how to keep public statements to a minimum? Particularly “false or misleading” statements? So why would a company that is (supposedly) under investigation for having repeatedly ignored legal business practices for years, during times when the stock price was 10X higher than it is now, suddenly NOT go throwing out whatever PRs and public statements they could come up with in an effort to prop the stock price back up?
And, of course, the biggest elephant in the room: They already told us they have “reportable data”. 700mg blinded NASH data was supposed to be ready by mid-December. Why haven’t they reported it? It would be perfectly “legal” according to the SEC to do so. Two options come to mind:
1. The data is so bad that they don’t want to report it.
2. The data is so good that a potential partner or partners have entered into discussions with the company for a partnership.
Everyone is free to read those tea leaves however they want to.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
