InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

gitreal

01/18/22 5:13 PM

#43752 RE: baystock1 #43751

That bnamericas "news story" was a nearly word for word regurgitation of the same info Mexus gave to other news platforms. Many others.

Yahoo issued the same info on Mexus but also issues news on hundreds of major corporations. Are you saying Yahoo had to screen/verify the Mexus info too?

How's that Irmex deal going? I bet we get another meaningless PR in a week....right before the next toxic note is convertible.

icon url

T-Hawk

01/19/22 8:55 AM

#43757 RE: baystock1 #43751

I'm not familiar with Bnamericas or what other content is included in their subscription besides the article in question. I do subscribe to other investment newsletters related to gold.

If any of those newsletters only passed on lightly modified PR information given out by the company as their source of information I'd drop that newsletter in an instant.

In this circumstance if the newlsetter did it's own filtering, I'd expect the newsletter to divulge some of the findings of their research/vetting to either corroborate or dissent from the company’s claims. Otherwise what's the point of paying someone to read information you can get free on the company's website?


Bnamericas content is by paid subscription and there is no way they would get any subscribers if all they do is pass on info from company PR's without any screening or filtering of their own.