InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

stockhlder101

02/03/07 3:33 AM

#55762 RE: mingwan0 #55760

great ming! > St. Jude article co-authored by T. Frudakis
:Blood. 2007 Jan 30; [Epub ahead of print]

Ancestry and pharmacogenetics of antileukemic drug toxicity.
Kishi S,
Cheng C,
French D,
Pei D,
Das S,
Cook EH,
Hijiya N,
Rizzari C,
Rosner GL,
Frudakis T,
Pui CH,
Evans WE,
Relling MV.
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States.

Treatment-related toxicity in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cannot only be life-threatening but may affect relapse risk. In 240 patients, we determined whether toxicities were related to 16 polymorphisms in genes linked to the pharmacodynamics of ALL chemotherapy, adjusting for age, race (self-reported or via ancestry-informative markers), sex and disease risk group (lower vs. higher-risk therapy). Toxicities (gastrointestinal, infectious, hepatic, and neurological) were assessed in each treatment phase. During the induction phase, when drugs subject to the steroid/cytochrome P4503A pathway predominated, genotypes in that pathway were important: vitamin D receptor (odds ratio [OR] 6.85 [95% confidence interval 1.73-27.0]) and cytochrome P4503A5 (OR 4.61 [1.11-19.2]) polymorphisms were related to gastrointestinal toxicity and infection, respectively. During the consolidation phase, when antifolates predominated, the reduced folate carrier polymorphism predicted gastrointestinal toxicity (OR 10.4 [1.35-80.4]) as it also did during continuation (OR 2.01 [1.06-4.11]). In all three treatment phases, a glucuronosyltransferase polymorphism predicted hyperbilirubinemia (p = 0.017, < 0.0001, and < 0.0001, respectively) and methotrexate clearance (p = 0.028), which was also independently associated with hyperbilirubinemia (p = 0.026). The genotype-phenotype associations were similar whether analyses were adjusted by self-reported race or ancestry-informative genetic markers. Germline polymorphisms are significant determinants of toxicity of antileukemic therapy.


icon url

Don'tDrinkTheKoolAid

02/03/07 3:57 AM

#55766 RE: mingwan0 #55760

What is your perspective? Will DNAG be directly involved with Merck and Moffit and not as just a place to run tests. Will Merck be splitting the profits with DNAG on any new drug developments?
If so what % do you believe DNAG will get and how long will it take for the first one to be developed. The building hasn't even been built (m2gen) yet and whole lot of ground work has to be laid first. Would appreciate a well thought out response I think it might clear up a lot of answers for the board as well. TIA
icon url

jever000

02/03/07 9:07 AM

#55781 RE: mingwan0 #55760

mingwan0, thanks! good to see you back......