InvestorsHub Logo

ClosetInvestor

01/12/22 8:58 AM

#200139 RE: docz21321312 #200135

“Pretty sure he said he will be sending it. He never specified which dose but it would only make sense it’s the 700mg dose since it was double blind trial.”

Why would NP tell shareholders that he’s sending the NASH data to multiple FDAs and 1,000 pharmaceutical companies without first announcing that data? Well, he’s done it before: CD12. He announced the data was unblinded and was being sent to multiple FDAs but he knew at the time of that PR that CD12 had failed. This could be what happened in this case: the 700mg data on 30 patients didn’t meet the endpoints of the trial.

Another scenario: Amarex has the 700mg data as they are listed as the sponsor on clinicaltrials.gov. That’s a big issue as it appears CYDY may not be able to pay the cash bond, which they said themselves in the 10q.

“To obtain the bond, the Company must tender $6.5 million in cash as collateral to the surety issuing the bond. If the Company is unable to provide the collateral in a timely fashion, its ability to review the databases and related information that Amarex holds may be delayed, potentially for several months or longer, resulting in additional delays in completion of the BLA resubmission process.”

Unfortunately, what makes sense to you doesn’t make sense in Nader land.

that_little_voice

01/12/22 9:30 AM

#200146 RE: docz21321312 #200135

So they unblinded and know exactly the data from Placebo arm but not 700mg?

What clinical development company is more focused on placebo arm than their own molecule arm?

They know the data. They are evaluating it since unblinding. If it was good, they would have sent out the usually PR by now. No PR means they are doing MITT and will present subsector data to fit the narrative they plan to spin.

3X Charm

01/12/22 2:44 PM

#200182 RE: docz21321312 #200135

Why would the best be assumed when Nader has only delivered the worst? Makes no sense to react otherwise.