Replies to post #104115 on Sunshine Biopharma Inc (SBFM)

[FormerBroker]

Stating the facts is not pumping as some think. Enthusiasm sometimes is mistaken for pumping. The clues are out there. I've been involved with stocks since 1987 and I take investing seriously that's why I have no problem talking with Andrew Telsey about SBFM legal stuff, Arie Nouriely of Aegis Capital, the transfer agent EQ or a biologist or immunologist. Whatever it takes to ensure my money is going to work hard.

[Outrun_Sunshine]

I'll be the first to admit I'm wrong when its time, ha. I told you I hold bulls to higher standards of claims than bears. Just like the DEF/definitive mix up.

You do realize the study identifies the "three best polyphenols for treating Covid that in theory work better than remdesivir"... not claiming the "three best Covid 19 treatments overall". Big difference in claims.

My main point with my pushback is that there is no official connection between that polyphenol study and SBFM-PL4 and you have stated there is. It's simply not confirmed, you agreed as much in messages, and I stand by all the confimed evidence in the PRs pointing to this being a novel compound Slilaty "designed on a computer". Rough quote from PR there.

Yet if someone read your posts they'd take it as fact. That's my point.

[Outrun_Sunshine]

Now you're claiming that Crich is an expert in polyphenols because he's from Europe and "they've studied polyphenols there."?

Man... come on haha. There's no connection.

Crich isn't mentioned ONCE in that study.