Replies to post #199622 on Cytodyn Inc (CYDY)

[bluefish1]

Truth is hard to take for some. Thanks for posting.

[that_little_voice]

So all of the wrong and lies are Scott Kelly fault?

[3X Charm]

It’s funny how predictable some things are, like Nader bumbling another press release and PA Video, tanking the stock and construing a complement on a new Cydy acquisition for orchestrating or screwing it up.

ANYONE who wants the truth can read the arbitration panel ruling on IDIOT NADERS PROSTAGENE/Pestell debacle as Pestell’ was “ FIRED BY NADER WITHOUT CAUSE”, thus neutering any potential gain from an expensive acquisition. Everyone who counts, knows the fiasco is on Nader. LMAO at the predicted response.

IDIOT NADER Spent over $300 million in 3 years without TC minding the store. When TC was watching over CYDY, the company spent SIX TIMES LESS PER YEAR AND MET HIV ENDPOINTS.

TC RETIRES AND NADER ACCOMPLISHED LESS THAN NOTHING ,SPENDING SIX TIME MORE MONEY PER YEAR.

Seven years on TC watch CYDY spent a little over $120m and ran a successful HIV TRIAL.

Then IDIOT NADER PURPOSELY SABOTAGED THE HIV BLA SUBMISSION as demonstrated in the leaked email to AMAREX.


I say we got less than nothing from Nader over the last 3 years because the company is much worse off with the following failures:

HIV BLA RTF on purposeful Nader sabotage
FDA Bombshell unprecedented rebuke of CYDY and Nader
3 failed CoVID trials
SECand DOJ Investigations
300 million share dilution since 2020.

Much more but the wife is hungry.

…and Nader had a somewhat tolerable comp package when adults were minding the store. As soon as TC bolted, Nader STOLE FROM SHAREHOLDERS WITH UNMITIGATED GREED!

$0.72 close of the disastrous NASH PR and PUMP video. Where are you TC, IDIOT NADER NEEDS HIS BABYSITTER BACK!

[theswordman]

Please explain (since people believe Google INSTEAD OF SEC filed docs)

Why was nodder given millions of shares for the acquisition?? Since it states " at the time had no decision-making power with respect to the acquisition"??

And also if that statement were true--then how can nodder be responsible for the ONLY successful trial for CYDY--since that RCT w a PE met--was under Tony Cs watch--not nodder??

[theswordman]

Please explain (since Google is to be believed INSTEAD OF SEC filed docs):

Why was nodder given millions of shares for the acquisition?? Since it states " at the time had no decision-making power with respect to the acquisition"??

And also --then how can nodder be responsible for the ONLY successful trial for CYDY--since that RCT w a PE met--was under Tony Cs watch--not nodder??