“I don't think you fully understand Frank and our company”
Make me understand by posting a photo of the car.
“Frank has been truthful from the beginning”
I disagree, using language tactics to play on peoples assumptions is deceitful
“…has not diluted like 99% of OTC companies”
So as to cover up the deceit, a genius strategy. Lots of OTC CEOs are very smart and know how to play people very well, it’s psychological artistry, subtle half truths, inferences that when coupled together seem to mean something but in fact each by themself do not apply to this company, hashtags placed under generalizations. This is the new deceit folks. Investors need to wake up to it, Twitter is being used to deceive and the SEC is doing nothing because technically it is not illegal to manipulate people’s false assumptions. People’s false assumptions are their own responsibility.
“You think NIHK has no cars, and Frank is lying?”
Correct. It is possible that there is a model car you can hold in your hand that was shipped with the rendered photos.
“answer me this? how will Frank benefit ?”
First, owning a company has tax benefits. Second, When Apple’s Titan project goes live this year somehow people will confuse that with the Tytan coin and the stock price may rise on that day, I think there are people who will confuse the two projects or think they are related since they are the same word when spoken, another deceiving tactic, the theme.
“Is he going to dilute shares when the PPS goes up”
If the price goes to 3 dollars who will care if he dilutes, you will be rich. But this is a big if, it relies on people conflating two unrelated projects at some unknown point in the future and it relies on no one criticizing the company for a lack of tangible product/photo/showroom.