InvestorsHub Logo

SwissCheeseAccount

12/23/21 3:32 AM

#97691 RE: SwissCheeseAccount #97690

Argus63

12/23/21 8:25 AM

#97693 RE: SwissCheeseAccount #97690

Damn straight Cheez! Have a great holiday.

GLTA

toogoodfella

12/23/21 8:42 AM

#97694 RE: SwissCheeseAccount #97690

CT's (10b) will fall under "impaired deem to reject" category
—-//—-//———

It will take some logical thinking to understand it.

Why “deemed to reject” ???
What’s the purpose of it on POR?

I think it’s ineffective to use it for argument on the highway.




stoxjock

12/23/21 4:14 PM

#97696 RE: SwissCheeseAccount #97690

Yes. In this .instance (and as evidenced by her rulings against Rex Wu etc.), Judge Chapman is not 'Shareholder-friendly'...

So, if in case we get a Ballot from LBIH to 'Release' Third parties such as BNY, be sure to "Check' the "Opt Out' Check-box, if we want to keep alive our rights to Sue BNY, IF we are not made whole for our CT Holdings. It is putting the "Onus' on us Shareholders, from getting 'snookered' by any deliberately Opaque Ballots that the Debtors in Chapter 11 that are trying to get out of Chapter 11, without fairly compensating their Creditors / Erstwhile Shareholders.

highwaymap

12/30/21 11:39 PM

#97814 RE: SwissCheeseAccount #97690

Tell me what you are trying to say with this hot mess of a post?

Are you trying to say that we need to approve the final distribution of 25k for each class and if we don't the trustee can't accept it? If so, you better go back and read the prospectus in its entirety buddy and reference it to the court filings.

Also, if you are trying to say lbhi needs our approval to discharge us, you are even more out there than I thought.

Anyways, you continue on with your scenarios. I will comment no more on them as they nowhere reflects reality.

Good luck to you though.