I stated it a few posts back. The vote should be whether shareholders that read here, IF they had the money...and that's a big if, because according to the Emu, last I heard, he wanted either $1 or $2 billion for vplm...so IF they had that kind of investment money, would they buy vplm (the patents)? I know it's a purely hypothetical question, as who's gonna have that kind of money? And it also requires total unbiased honesty to answer. That said, I think it's still an interesting question worth asking & answering, because it will show a comparison to what the bug dog Voip service providers have shown so far, which is that they don't think it's worth it to buy vplm. If all involved assume that the patents are indeed "ALL THAT", as has been described by vplm over the past 10 yrs or so, then OBVIOUSLY there would be at least SOME significant value & incentive for the big companies to buy the patents for a variety of revenue reasons,ie, stopping competitors, stopping the infringment lawsuits (and triple damages) & simply the total control of the vast internet communications industry. So all of above is POWER...VAST POWER!
So again, the vote I'd like to see is if you had that kind of money would you buy the patents? So far there are only 4 votes & they are all no votes except one person says "his group" would be in for $80k but that's not a valid vote because the asking price is 1 or 2 billion dollars . A sale for $800k would do nothing for shareholders. So it has to be at least a billion. So it's a fantasy question, but I think it still can be answered.
So how about you? Would you buy the company right now if you had access or control over 1 or 2 billion dollars? I think it's a good question & with enough replies, will show something.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
