InvestorsHub Logo

jeddiemack

12/15/21 8:52 PM

#704377 RE: Robert from yahoo bd #704361

fact is ... if... ifs and buts were candy and nuts...

we could be released by now.

good grief... takes nothing more than a stroke of the pen.

They took us under as simply as they could release us..

its not magic... its simple.

just do it already...

Golfbum22

12/16/21 11:31 AM

#704413 RE: Robert from yahoo bd #704361

It might not have been calamari hired a few years earlier

It could have been Otting or anyone

But yes, I agree it would have helped

Donotunderstand

12/16/21 4:07 PM

#704454 RE: Robert from yahoo bd #704361

Since there was no difference when MC came in

Since - freedom - release of obligation from the LP was 100% in the sole hands of treasury (unless FHMA wanted to refuse such gift !)

yup

I am positive that had DJT had his way from day one - nothing would be different than MC for two years and SM for four

but - who knows - it could have been worse --- as we saw the key single MC action was the crazy high capital level he set

(and the smoke and mirrors hold the cash and write IOUs --- so it could have been worse if it was four years of MC)

sorry but you asked - if possible and none of us know