Replies to post #704200 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[FFFacts]

If a federal court rules that in fact the federal government has taken the private shareholders property, that shareholder compensation is zero, wouldn't the federal government be the proud owner of $7T+ in federal government balance sheet liabilities?

How specifically would, "Accounting changes mitigate" the impact on a total Takings?

They can create accounting rules/changes to disallow the books on the balance sheet by making up accounting rules. Just like OMB did before. https://www.heritage.org/housing/report/revealing-fannie-maes-and-freddie-macs-budget-costs-step-toward-gse-elimination

In Cedar Point Nursery, both parties agreed to a stipulated court order that California would no longer engage in the unconstitutional action. But the SCOTUS said on remand that damages were in fact due to the aggreived Plaintiffs and Cedar Point Nursery was entitled to a trial on damages for the temporary taking by the state government of their real property rights but agreed to the stipulated order instead.

The Net Worth Sweep is one of the most egregious forms of government overreach in US history and if it is ruled a temporary taking of private shareholder property, I think damages could be substantial.

Yes, so there was no real concrete measurable damage to the landowners right? It was just a stipulated order providing for declaratory relief.