InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

FFFacts

12/13/21 9:24 PM

#704118 RE: Robert from yahoo bd #704117

Can you think of any reason why the federal government would NOT want a federal judge to find that a total Taking has occurred? I can think of $7.2 TRILLION REASONS.



Accounting changes can mitigate impact on a total takings.

Suppose it's a partial or temporary taking, wouldn't the court follow the same damage calculations as the SCOTUS instructed on remand last term in Cedar Point Nursery?


What was the remedy for the physical taking? What was the actual loss to the owners? Was it just really a declaratory victory with no real compensable harm? If there was a physical occupation of personal property by govt sanctioned actors how much did the property owner lose?

Two different matters.