InvestorsHub Logo

MackG

12/10/21 9:33 AM

#385994 RE: loanranger #385993

"Just thought that might be a more appropriate priority."
And that is why Leo is in discussions with other drug companies regarding licensing deals, and the apparent reason for his implied confidence that IPIX will have a sufficient infusion of cash to consider the purchase of drugs that will expand the IPIX pipeline. The 1st quarter of 2022 will reveal what is now going on behind the scenes.

FatAlbert1986

12/10/21 11:01 AM

#386000 RE: loanranger #385993

Management received all data sometime last week….. He sent a PR showing confidence… What’s the holdup? Bureaucracy? Additional pipeline assets, for what? To take into BK? Where are the $ coming from? You? Why are you still posting on this mess of a company? Why the complete standstill at .06? Seem odd? So many questions…. Why use relinquish like that in a sentence you say?

farrell90

12/10/21 1:36 PM

#386005 RE: loanranger #385993

Britain's NHS recently updated their Covid statistics.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/articles/coronaviruscovid19/latestinsights

Below is my interpretation of the English data.

What is apparent is that even though the Britain has achieved an over a 90% vaccination rate, Covid infection rates are now almost as high as the peak infection rate in Jan and Feb 2021. While the deaths and hospitalizations have declined they continue to persist at a relatively high level.

The data supports the reported shortcomings of the vaccines. The vaccines do not prevent reinfection and the vaccinated can spread Covid at an unfortunate rate. The vaccine lowers the rate of hospitalization and death , but the risk persists.

Double vacinnated individuals have a very low death rate.

The absolute deaths in the single vaccinated individual and unvaccinated are almost the same in October 2021.Of course, the rate of death is still higher in the unvaccinated.

Indivduals at risk need to be double vaccinated.

There is no significant decrease in protection in the double vaccinated with time which makes the rationale for boosters in the double vaccinated difficult to understand.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/articles/coronaviruscovid19latestinsights/deaths#deaths-by-vaccination-status

The death rate and hospitalization rate in young healthy individuals is very low. Since herd immunity is not possible and vaccinated individuals have a high rate of reinfection and transmission there is no rationale for vaccinating young healthy individuals.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/articles/coronaviruscovid19latestinsights/hospitals


If countries are going to mask and social distance the recommendations must be for both the vaccinated and unvaccinated

There is no evidence of herd immunity since the infection rate and vaccination rate are both high.

It is also obvious the world is at risk for future cornavirus mutations. Future variants are inevitable at this rate of infection and transmission.

The interpretation of the data is just my opinion.Read it yourself to come to your conclusions.

IMO the English public health data is the best in the world and their data most likely applies to most highly urbanized countries including the USA. The US data is collected by the local health departments and reported to the states; the variation in testing and collection standards of Covid data contributes to the confusion regarding Covid recommendations in the US.

JMO,

Farrell

kfcyahoo

12/10/21 6:37 PM

#386009 RE: loanranger #385993

“”Each step that the vaccine mandates get squashed in the US is another step towards getting Brilacidin in the public’s eyes."

Something that might do more to enhance the profile of Brilacidin in the public's eyes...even more than highlighting whatever flaws there may be in the vaccine programs...is a showing that Brilacidin is effective in treating the disease that the vaccines are designed to inhibit.

Just thought that might be a more appropriate priority, given that it is something that IPIX management might actually be able to do something about. Might.””

Precisely why the current leader should be replaced. But, guess what, he’s in bed with the other board members. I bet Jane wishes she could fire him, but she can’t. The board controls all and they answer to no one. Makes me wonder why she has stayed and accepted the Scarlet Letter of companies.