InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Hay Day

12/10/21 9:41 AM

#106971 RE: prophet2 #106964

Hello P2. Never to this extremely large level. Consensus that I have gathered is it is definitely for a legal tax benefit and likely done prior to anticipated pps growth. Hoping for the best.
icon url

nyt

12/10/21 10:15 AM

#106974 RE: prophet2 #106964

Yes, he absolutely has done this many times before and tried to keep it quiet by failing to file it for something like 2 yrs. Of course he was allowed to get away with that, as well as so much else. I think the past total was more than this time.



justconnectthedots
icon url

drumming4life

12/10/21 11:33 AM

#106979 RE: prophet2 #106964

P2…I believe the only shares Emil exchanged for warrants were the shares he was granted through the anti-dilution clause he entered into when he bought the company. I don’t recall off the top of my head what the exact amount was but feel it’s in the 600M range.