LET'S TALK ABOUT OFFICIAL DATA
You never checked the data presented by Health and Human Services dumbo Xavier whatever his last name may be.
In that Louisianna case, the Dumbo was arguing against herd/natural immunity, lots and lots of fact check stuff like you present here. Saying that natural immunity was not supported by data.
Now on the other hand, two of the noted scholars, that did present SCIENTIFIC evidence, showed that natural immunity was as good and possibly more durable than the jab.
The Judge ruled against Dumbo saying in essence that he made an argument but presented ABSOLUTELY NO DATA/EVIDENCE (no data showing no natural immunity). DUMBO showed absolutely nothing to support his claims!!!
See, these clowns can only fool you (Janice) on your fact check sites so you can argue specious and non-scientific bullshit that's put out there by the Dumbos.
When they walk into Court, their pants fall down and are shamed for the carnival jacks that they truly are.
No, dear Janice, I won't spoon feed you how to get the Order. Don't be coy, look it up yourself and read what a gov't bureaucrat presented to the Court ------ NOTHING NO DATA NO DATA NO SCIENCE.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
