InvestorsHub Logo

dread50above

02/01/07 1:12 PM

#10107 RE: allnumbers #10106

Well, it's a long time before that thing goes up but it certainly seems like we are along the developmental and testing track.

I think the credibility it brings the technology is more important than any revenues this will ever generate from NASA anyway.

When NASA starts flying lawnmowers and tractors to the moon, we have a problem!

"Hello Houston!"

Artguy

02/01/07 4:24 PM

#10111 RE: allnumbers #10106

Interesting. Makes you wonder what the problems are. There has to be a compelling reason NASA isn't completely on board with them driving the next Rover. They have a nice site and they certainly claim amazing things like working in big boats AND replacing the internal combustion engine. Must be those pesky batteries again.

The blinking tag at the top asking me to find out how to license their tech, seems a touch disparate to me, but anything that moves us away from buying oil from terrorists is a big plus, so more power to them, so to speak. EOM