Good job. Thompson obviously thinks he has a good new angle here. I'm not totally sure what he was attempting with that after the fact letter, but he is a very smart guy.
Perhaps a testimony as president added to the letter might suffice, as our other poster noted.
The issue is that this letter doesn't address whether the unconstitutional provision prevented the execution of this framework.
There can be about a million political factors that would have prevented him from being successful in R&R, but only one that's relevant to shareholder damages in this court case. This letter doesn't address that factor and therefore means nothing, IMO.
Please show me sentences in that PR that says FREE them (v end conservatorship which could be via 11 or death or wind down)
And why not point to the results of the call for a report ?
What did the DJT administration report say - did it say FREE THEM in a way good for us -- would love to see that sentence which then is the one to send the lawyer
thank you for your efforts -- all pulling in same direction - I just did not read the VAGUE and VAGUER wording of the PR as very meaningful right now
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
