Replies to post #4951 on The Question and Answer Board (IHUB)

[Ruellit]

Slick Matt, good job on getting this guy to give you his private info. lol Now what ya gonna do with it?

muel <g>

[sarals]

Matt,

That's amazing... do you think he really gets that price for promos? That is so outrageous!

And who would believe this line?

Also observe that over the last few days prior to our promotion the price of the stock almost always rises as rumor of our involvement very often causes a phenomenon known as "Advance Volume King Activity."

Sara
p.s. I have a friend at work who runs his own website and is a real sharp programmer... I'll ask if he has any ideas for you.

[Bernard Ng]

Hey Fatty, nice spy work you've done to uncover the spammer on IH. Next time, ask him if I'm one of his employees...ggg, making all those money and can't afford to buy a real web hosting service :-)

signed,
Bernard

[Tatari Gami]

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 16500 / April 4, 2000

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen B. Marek and Dominic Roelandt, No.Civ. 00-600-PHX-EHC (USDC D.Az.)

The Commission announced today that it has filed a federal court action to halt the fraudulent touting over the Internet of 35 microcap companies. The Commission's complaint names as defendants Dominic Roelandt of Belgium, using the name "Coldstocks," and Stephen B. Marek, formerly of Salome, Arizona and now located in British Columbia, using the names "BigProfitNews" and "Bulls-Eye Stocks." The complaint alleges that, often in combination, Roelandt and Marek touted the stocks in free e-mail newsletters and on Internet websites in the names of the three entities from at least June 1999 through March 17, 2000. The complaint further alleges that the e-mail messages or websites contained various false and misleading statements concerning the claimed performance of Marek's and Roelandt's past stock picks, their trading intentions, and compensation received by Marek. The Commission's action, filed in the U.S. District Court in Phoenix, Arizona, seeks a temporary restraining order to prohibit Roelandt and Marek from violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws, a freeze of Marek's assets, an accounting and repatriation of assets.

The complaint further alleges that nearly all of Roelandt's and Marek's touts caused the issuers' stock price and volume to increase significantly in the short term with most prices returning to pre-tout levels within a week or two. According to the complaint, in several instances, Roelandt and Marek sold their personal holdings in the stocks immediately after sending the e-mail messages to thousands of subscribers, thereby realizing at least $41,958 and $100,835 in profits, respectively.

The complaint alleges that Roelandt and Marek violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.


The Commission wishes to thank the British Columbia Securities Commission for its assistance in this matter.


CONTACTS:

Donald M. Hoerl, Associate Regional Administrator

Katherine Addleman, Assistant Regional Director of Enforcement

Michael R. MacPhail, Deputy Assistant Regional Director

Central Regional Office, [phone]

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr16500.htm

***************************************************************

LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 16674 / August 31, 2000

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen B. Marek and Dominic Roelandt, No.Civ. 00-600-PHX-EHC (U.S.D.C., D. Az.)

On August 29, 2000, Stephen B. Marek and Dominic Roelandt were enjoined, by consent and without admitting or denying the complaint's allegations, from violating the antifraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Marek was ordered to pay disgorgement of $100,835 and a civil penalty of $100,835. Roelandt was ordered to pay disgorgement of $41,958 and a civil penalty of $41,958.

The Commission's complaint, filed April 4, 2000 charged that Roelandt, using an Internet newsletter named "Coldstocks," and Marek, using newsletters named "BigProfitNews" and "Bulls-Eye Stocks," touted the stocks of 35 microcap companies over the Internet. The complaint alleged that e-mail messages or websites contained various false and misleading statements concerning the claimed performance of Marek's and Roelandt's past stock picks, their trading intentions, and compensation received by Marek. U.S. District Judge Earl H. Carroll of the District Court in Phoenix, Arizona issued the order.

The Commission wishes to thank the British Columbia Securities Commission for its assistance in this matter.

See also, Litigation Release No. 16500 (April 4, 2000)

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr16674.htm

[WillyWizard]

ROFLMAO,

Willy