Yep. This behavior is just in Naders nature. He does whatever he wants, whenever he wants. History repeats, particularly when the previous consequences are ignored.
Who is "cooked"? It couldn't be NP for numerous reasons. But the two most obvious reasons are:
1) Amarex submitted the BLA - not NP. As the CRO, Amarex is fully responsible for the content of the BLA, not NP. LOL 2) submitting an incomplete BLA is grounds for rejection - it's not a "false statement".
He is cooked. On the BLA Application it clearly states "Warning: A willfully false statement is a criminal offense, U.S. Code, title 18, section 1001"