My comment reflects my OPINION that there is a massive, and I mean massive, naked short position against IPIX. I will not go into numbers so no questions regarding same please. Can I prove it, no, but I have a person in my circle of data sharers who is about the smartest person I have ever seen in analyzing daily trading action and has consistently followed IPIX since the MAKO take down and can give point by point examples showing it is a classic short play. This has been going on for years so the position has steadily grown during the long periods of price compression. They almost had us beat but Covid allowed a "rabbit hole" IMO for IPIX to survive and now the ones with the boot on their throats are the naked shorters.
Certified correct, no. But IMO quite similar to expected trial results - not guaranteed but based on prior knowledge of how Brilacidin came into being, the super computer analyzing to maximize benefits and minimize side effects, the SI, the RBL investigations, the planned peer papers, the DOD Biological Weapons convention presentation, the safety validation DURING the current trial by the Oversight Committee, the fast tracking of B, etc, etc. one can make a pretty good case as to the expected outcome.
As I have consistently stated, I am a fringe player that happens to have acquired a circle of excellent friends and qualified people in various fashions that I trust as they spell out their reasoning, not just making outlandish statements. That is the basis for my comment.
Excellent top line results will put an end to their belief that they can bankrupt IPIX. A major grant or a major partnership spells major financial despair for many of them an should the government jump on the Brilacidin bandwagon I believe we could see some astounding financial tremors akin to the GameStop and AMC fiascos.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
