Actually, beas, what you have posted is incorrect. That's the old management's attempt at a company restructuring. George has done away with all of that.
Beas You Are Answering Your Own Question!!! This is like you said has nothing to do with American Blockchain Inc. This is the old management’s appeal to SEC for FINRA denying them for name change and Reverse Split. The company is under new custodianship and they were denied for not filing their financials, that is why FINRA DENIED them. They simply thought by going to SEC that decision would be reversed. So it is a new clean slate for George and soon to be named American Blockchain Inc. If you read the Form 10 by George it says company was delinquent with financials and he is planing to file for quarterly with OTCM as a soon as Form 10 review is finalized. Why does SEC still extent the old company’s appeal about FINRA’s decision? It is simply legal procedure that they have to follow through. Once Form 10 review is completed, that appeal has no meaning to new owner and the appeal will fall off too. Analogy is here someone who previously owned a company tried to appeal the case to court and they died and company is owned by someone else now. CASE CLOSED!!!