Interesting write up… however am I not sure about the accuracy of many statements.
- In response to a Complaint one files an Answer and does not address the points in a PR
- Evidence is only produced through Discovery and not presented in a Complaint or Answer
- Yes, Mens Rea refers to the intent with which the defendant acted but Mens Rea is an element of Criminal law, NOT Civil / Contract law; eg Murder 1 vs Murder 2 vs Manslaughter… elements are the same for all 3 with the distinguishing difference being the Mens Rea, or intent..
- No summary judgement possible because there are facts in contention; read FRCP Rule 56 if you want more details
- the Court does not prepare for anything; plaintiffs and defendants prepare. Plus in this case RLFTF requested trial by jury
- agree with the assessment that this will take years to resolve if given to the court system
I am likely in the minority but I still think the entire disagreement is fabricated to provide a pretext for picking up retail shares. Too many things do not add up, especially the timing and even the request for a trial by jury (adds additional time and expense to the trial when RLFTF wants a speedy resolution due to their demands of specific performance). PLUS if I were NRXP I would start by presenting the jury with the fact that RLFTF is trying to stop NRXP from making a covid vaccine because RLFTF prefers people to catch COVID and get sick so that RLFTF can sell more product- imagine leading off with this image of RLFTF to the jury members
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
