Replies to post #63502 on Good Vibrations Shoes Inc (GVSI)

[MrNormall]

Technically speaking this should be a yield sign already anyway
Lots of OTCM filers that have posted less information than $GVSI and are pink current which is a joke

The OTC has dropped the ball in regards to SEC filer categorization. Expect more updates soon

Should be yield signs for Expert Market stocks that have posted up to date financials that have not been reviewed yet and or approved, specifically SEC filers prior to the 28th and afterwards

[Scumbag Fraudsters]

No he won't.

Barton barely got singed for his part in defrauding investors in four stocks, and he was never charged with a crime or spent a day in jail.

And then to rub salt in the wound, the SEC stole the money they seized from Barton that should have been returned to investors.

Last month I asked them what happened to the recovered assets. This was their reply:

In the matter of SEC v Raymond Barton, a distribution was not ordered. Any funds to be collected were transferred to treasury.

That shows me they don't give a flying flip about investors, only their own coffers.

And you think they're gonna care about little fish Georgie?

[KeithPB50]

Let me try to keep this as simple as possible. BF BORGERS AUDITED the 2019 & 2020 “Unaudited Financials” and CERTIFIED that nothing was “out or the ordinary”.

You CANNOT just go back and LEGALLY update/change “UNAUDITED FINANCIALS” and by use of a “MAGIC WAND” mark the previously reported “UNAUDITED” financial documents “as AUDITED”.

There is NO MISTAKE on the FORM 10. I think BF BORGERS knows a little bit more than most people on what the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) REQUIRES on the FORM 10.

Most common laymen obviously do not understand complicated accounting principles, procedures, terminology or methods.

You can now put that argument that the Financials were “UNAUDITED” to rest. A summary statement from BF BORGERS has been reposted many, many times here on the $GVSI Board. Next.