But for the Unconstitionally insulated FHFA Director Mel Watt, how far along in the RECAP,RELIST, AND RELEASE PROCESS WOULD BE AT NOW?
Should the Collins Plaintiffs really have the Burden of Proof, given the Defendant is in absolute control of private POTUS intra governmental communications?
"Large portions of Defendants’ supplemental briefs attack a straw man.
Plaintiffs’ contention is not that President Trump “desired a swift end to the Third
Amendment” for its own sake, Treas. Br. 5, but that his Administration actively
pursued housing finance reform plans that could not have been completed without
changes to the Companies’ capital structures that would have benefitted the private
shareholders. Despite Defendants’ attempts at misdirection, the public record is clear
that President Trump would have fired Director Watt but for his for-cause removal
protection, and Plaintiffs are thus entitled to a remedy under the Supreme Court’s
decision. The appropriate remedy is to order Defendants to do what would have been
done absent the constitutional violation."
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
