You are correct to question those "con" statements about IPIX, Michel. My intent is to show the contrast between the pro and con arguments, with a clear bias to the "pro" side.
So many of the "con" arguments offered about IPIX are false, ludicrous, silly, trivial, defamatory or worse. I've selected only a few of the "cons", while the "pro" arguments can be independently verified.
When one looks at the arguments on both sides, the comparison should speak for itself.
The CEO is posting on stock boards under an assumed name
in what forum and with what aliases?
It was alleged that I was Leo Ehrlich because there is an L, an E, and an O in my name. This of course is not true as you can see from my signature.
You'll have to take my word for it. Anyone who thinks/claims a CEO of a publicly traded company is pushing information through a stock message board is either very uninformed or nefarious. Why would he do that? He can literally sit back and do next to nothing and collect another $400K/year for the next decade if the trials fail.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
