Replies to post #693771 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[jog49]

My understanding is the plans are in the works as we speak. Said something about learning both Spanish and Chinese languages.

[s404n1tn0cc]

The contract with Treasury FHFA and the Twins are VOID.
Why? There is no period when this rescue ends And therefore when it performs. .
Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel
Doctrine of Frustration [S. 56]
Impossible in itself.
Supervening impossibility or illegality, involving actions contrary to law or public policy.
The outbreak of war, war restrictions, illegal to trade with the enemy, etc.
Destruction of subject-matter by fire, explosion, spoilage of dates by water and sewage due to the sinking of the ship.
Happening of an event which rendered the contract impossible of performance but would not include hard and difficult cases of abnormal rise or fall or price, depreciation of the currency, closure of Suez Canal involving longer route and journey involving more freight and delay.
Unavailability due to lawful seizure, requisition, detention of charted ship running aground.
The imposition of government restrictions or orders***.

7. Doctrine of Executive Necessity (S. 68

Read more at Legal Bites © Reserved: https://www.legalbites.in/8-contract-law-doctrines-you-must-know/Circumstances must occur under any system of law in which it becomes necessary to hold one person to be accountable to another without any agreement on the part of the former to be so accountable, on the ground that otherwise, he would be retaining money or some other benefit which comes into his own hands to which the law regards the other person as better entitled, or on the ground that without such accountability, the other would unjustly suffer loss. The law of quasi-contract exists to provide remedies in circumstances of this kind”.

8. Doctrine of Ratification (s. 196

SEE HERE
https://www.legalbites.in/8-contract-law-doctrines-you-must-know/

Summary No Consideration to The owners of the companies.
No Consideration to the liquidation preferrence...Meaning the 3%
Capitolization does not equal the 97% remaining assets to be
controlling the parties Treasury/FHFA. Besides the Company is not
allowed to liquidate 10% of its assets to cover the cost of
capitolization with 7% excess capitol.
The foregoing expressly implies Congress's illegal takeover of
FNMA and FMCC.