IMO, The only Sigma Labs piece from last week I saw was from Peter Leeds (now, a salaried writer), on 8/27, he could very well have been assigned to write a bit about Sigma for the article, which contained several other stocks.
IMO, The key statement(s) from the Article:
“Please note that penny stocks are notoriously volatile.”
“As is the case with all penny stocks, SGLB is a highly speculative trade, and the second half of 2021 will show whether the group can deliver on all its promises. For now, I believe it just may be an intriguing and inexpensive play on the continued rise of 3D printing, with reportedly 80% of major manufacturers intending to increase their usage of those technologies, and with a potential boost from the U.S. infrastructure bill.”
IMO, The most important part of those statements above is:
1. “SGLB is a highly speculative trade,”
2. “For now, I believe it just may be an intriguing and inexpensive play“
IMO, His use of "inexpensive play" should be interpreted as a trade (play), not invest. Which is what most of us have been saying for quite awhile, Could get interesting… If the choice is made to do anything with SGLB at all.
Also, Note there was no clear indication that he is holding any position in SGLB, which according to the article, means he currently has no position in Sigma Labs.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
