Just my two cents worth. Maybe if the original post that was factual and brought out a real issue for discussion was not censored we would not be discussing all the extra curricular activity that has come about. I still stand by the original post as the only facts that have been put forth here. I don't think professional people handle these matters this way. If the post had not been censored then we could have had a discussion on the FACTS of what transpired. I would have been willing to listen to all sides and thoughts on the topic. But that did not happen and now the situation will be dealt with differently.
For the record I don't know brew, haven't talked or communicated with him/her ever. Unlike brew I don't post things I say I am going to do and then not follow through.
I tried to bring this to this board for discussion to see if the folks here (many of whom I respect) could have a frank discussion on whether or not a good company conducts themselves in this manner when dealing with investors. Obviously that did not happen.
Everyone who may post what some of you view as negative is not a "paid basher" I can only speak for myself when I say that I would like to discuss the good and the bad.
Maybe the board should not be so quick to censor a topic next time.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
