InvestorsHub Logo

twister1

08/20/21 3:57 PM

#7293 RE: Endurance12 #7292

I don't agree with your position...
Yet i understand it.
AND i respect that you voted.
The people that piss me off i call (nonplayers) The Non Voting Group.
Those are the numbers, percentage wise still being counted as part of the whole.

Apparently the "Fors" outnumber the "Against", head to head...
But the non voters get counted next to the against votes, creating not enough "for" votes percentage of the whole.

FUNMAN

08/21/21 8:36 AM

#7298 RE: Endurance12 #7292

Voting "no" is also the responsible thing. Endurance12 VOTED NO. The pathetic are the shareholders NOT voting. You did vote.

I am okay with you having a different opinion than me.

The pathetic cannot take the time to make the effort to vote.

There's a difference.

Those that don't vote have no rights to complain about Simon's/Tilray's performance.

That goes for shareholders and citizens after general elections.

Those that vote get to own their vote and the consequences of that vote.

Endurance12 Friday, 08/20/21 03:05:31 PM
Re: FUNMAN post# 7289
Post # 7292 of 7296

I'm not a stoner / pathetic.

I just disagree. I prefer a shorter leash than you do.

voting NO for me is prudent not personal.

Cool?