1) To be clear, the $NWGC TA would not release shareholder data to anyone, except a CEO.
"If someone were going to take over a shell, the first questions would be the share structure, market cap, and is it clean."
"when Yahoo reports....." ??? Seriously? Most stock site data Like Yahoo's on OTC stocks is so out of date, it should be considered fraud. Only credible share data is from a TA and/or active TA reports to OTCMarkets.
2) The Judge had no issue with the shareholder meeting results. It was unanimous. I had no issue with it, and no shareholder protested, and non ever did.
3) Please do not confuse what an attorney told the judge, one who backed out, too embarrassed to tell the judge why(?) he backed out, with what Mark Miller told(?) a judge. Mark Miller told the judge nothing, Mark Hired a law firm ask the court to order a shareholder meeting as a valid shareholder of NWGC. The Law firm IMO, failed... to set up the shareholder meeting properly in the first place. Bob's lawyer has addressed that issue, one of 2 ways. Either will solve the problem
"Salomonsky's" had no issued, voteable shares.
You are getting very warm IMO "in light of the prior fraud under Talbot no one wants to admit they had control. "
I am buying more NWGC shares next week.
It will be an epic week IMO.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
