You are okay with this statement? Did you or did you not publicly post that this lawyer inquired about a-c-cr stock as a form of compensation? Perhaps for his relative. Without your prodding or suggesting?
If you're telling the truth and the other party is not, you're fine with this? You do not have to address this as I'm more shining a light on possible fraud by other entities. All this should come out in the discovery portion of the SEC investigation.
And in my speculated opinion, I believe more than two parties have received wells notices and other SEC letters. These kinds of letters and correspondence by the SEC and doj can and will show up on edgar. Whether any of you want it to or not. In almost every single case, when I see a company file a form15, it comes out later that they indeed were notified by the SEC of a plan to litigate against the company or officers. At the very least the ceo was aware of delisting if they didn't submit financials by a set date. So instead they bail and run and hide from the government and common shareholders and give them time to unload on uninformed stock traders.
To seriously protect the trading public like the SEC is fondly known to quote, if a company was a SEC filer and files a form15, the stock should be halted from trading. Until the corp can produce a legit reason for filing that form.
If I'm not mistaken this lawyer letter is part of the process to lift the restricted legends from whoever is in control of a-c-cr, but certainly not a letter to assist you.
Neither Attorney Stephen Mills nor any person associated with his law firm owns any shares of issuer’s securities and has never received or has any agreement to receive any of the issuer’s stock in payment for services.
Integral gave you a righteous spanking on a regular basis and it was fun to watch - the problem was that you weren't smart enough to understand Integral schooled you.