“FDIC laws are applied only to FDIC and Banks.”
No one claimed they were not.
“HERA is copy of FDIC laws. “
False. If HERA was a copy, it would be identical.
“There are so many articles about this.”
Which “article” says HERA was identical? None.
Your premise, then, is that an Industry X regulatory and recovery statute is *never* a reasonable basis for a Industry Y?
If merely parroting and reparroting a fact is the same as a well-articulated reasoning about the logical relevancy of that fact in relation to to the claim made, then you should quit while you are ahead.
“ Plaintiffs, defendants and Judges have discussed this aspect. Please read DC appeal court's Perry ruling.”
Which statement by the US Appeals Court for The DC Circuit are you citing?
“The most contentious NWS challenge is based on incidental powers of Conservators that is copied from FDIC laws.”
Which claim? How so?
Copied? False. Before repeating conclusions, reach them yourself and explain them. Absent that it is a waste of any rational adult’s time.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
