InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

stervc

08/04/21 2:03 PM

#63968 RE: trader59 #63952

trader59, with that "front loaded thought...

I believe many of those shareholders that bought MONI back at or near its lows are gone. Research the volume history and look at how consistently there seems to have always been a transition of old investors to new investors by researching the volume history of this stock. If things were as you have stated, then the price would have been closer towards its 52 week lows versus its 52 week highs.

They have retired/cancelled 2.1 billion shares and is in the process of retiring/cancelling another 220 million shares. This means that after this next round of eliminating shares, the Outstanding Shares (OS) is going to be... 623,262,060 shares.... I repeat... 623,262,060 shares.

Let's put this in proper perspective for people to truly understand how great the situation is here. I am still holding TSNP (now HMBL) as it went from .0001 to $1.93 per share while having an OS of nearly 4.5 billion shares that later dropped down to nearly 3.9 billion shares. Question??? Do you think people didn't buy TSNP because they didn't get in at or near the bottom? Some people were over there crying that it was frontloaded in the .000s and to stay away from it because of such. Those that took that advice likely missed out on some huge gains.

I am still holding NSAV as it went from .0001 to .1493 per share and expected to go much much higher while having an OS of nearly 6 billion shares. Heck, the same logic above applies. I can post many penny stocks that have had huge moves while having a far greater OS than what we have here with MONI. I'm not because I think those that might of had such a concern truly see my point.

Wait... there's more to consider...

v/r
Sterling
icon url

stervc

08/04/21 2:33 PM

#63983 RE: trader59 #63952

trader59, to further add, with that "front loaded" thought...

That thought is for the unexperienced investors/traders that don't know better. Go fish. With what you are saying, that term "front loaded" applies to every single stock on the market that have ever traded. I hope this is clearly now understood.

Before I explain this... first... again... They have retired/cancelled 2.1 billion shares and is in the process of retiring/cancelling another 220 million shares. This means that after this next round of eliminating shares, the Outstanding Shares (OS) is going to be... 623,262,060 shares.... I repeat... 623,262,060 shares.

Question??? Do you think people are not buying Microsoft (MSFT) today at over $286.00+ per share because they didn't buy it at its bottom years ago? Do you think people are not buying Cisco (CSCO) today at $55.00+ per share because they didn't buy it at its bottom years ago? I'll stop here as I can come up with hundreds and hundreds of examples. Heck, probably thousands of examples.

If investors saw things as you have stated, then nobody would never buy any stock within the market because it would have been front loaded. Technically speaking, every stock in the market has been front loaded based on such a view. So maybe front loading is not a bad thing since technically it exists in every single stock that exists within the market.

I was not fortunate to buy shares here in MONI back when it was .0001 per share or so. Heck, I doubt any of us here now was fortunate enough to get into MONI at its lows. Thousands and thousands of stocks were not bought by investors at their lows. Every single stock within the market have investors that were not fortunate enough to have been bought at or near their lows. If that was a reason not to invest, then the market would not exist because nobody would buy anything for that matter.

The #1 reason why any of us buy a stock is because of one word... potential. Nobody buys a stock today if it is already trading where it is worth. That is why it's called... Investing. That would not be investing if anyone did. We all buy a stock because of the "potential" that we believe exists for growth based on what has been indicated to be coming into that stock. We buy a stock because of the "potential" value that we believe it will be worth one day in the future.

After doing even more DD, I am very confident that MONI has some huge potential for growth that is much further along to making this growth manifest into a reality than most penny stocks. I think we are in great hands.

v/r
Sterling