Awesome read powerplay filled with Amazing details. So if I saw correctly at the bottom of the second paragraph it stated The main reason for the judges dismissal was HCMC is arguing Combustion, but in one of their Attachments it states there is no Combustion. So at his point I'm going to take that as the judge realizing it was a typo and had it went farther PM Could have used that to have it dismissed on those grounds anyway. I have not personally held one of these units in my hand, but Technically it should be simple enough to prove if this thing achieves combustion or not. In-fact I'm very curious now I may just purchase one and bring to into the Lab at work reverse engineer it and see what exactly makes it tick.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
