InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Jayplayer

08/02/21 7:21 PM

#55024 RE: Lucy K #55023

How many shares do you own?
icon url

Whombat40

08/02/21 8:05 PM

#55029 RE: Lucy K #55023

You nailed it exactly. I would bet it WAS written and completely handled by law students or the lowest on the totem pole because they thought this was a slam dunk. Now they need an extension so their "real" lawyers can step in and get up to speed.
icon url

Potusel

08/03/21 7:00 AM

#55050 RE: Lucy K #55023

"What’s the reason they need an extension?"

Take it easy there, Lucy K.

Settlement?

The only thing I know is that HCMC and the judge have PM by the balls.

Why the judge?:

This is my post from Sunday, 07/25/21 06:44:46 AM:

And HERE IS THE KICKER FOR HCMC: "If HCM has plausibly alleged that some - even partial - combustion is required, (CAPS mine) THEN THE COURT WILL DENY THE MOTION TO DISMISS".

Good luck to us all.
icon url

Lucy K

08/05/21 12:55 PM

#55178 RE: Lucy K #55023

As I wrote on Aug 2 regarding HCMC's Motion for Extension of Time

I hate to say it but what a really poorly written request. These lawyers look really lazy and unwilling to make a strong argument for anything. I am concerned. What’s the reason they need an extension? State it in the filing. Attach a declaration setting forth whose schedule is affected and why. You would think they would have learned their lesson from the last mishap. Apparently they didn’t. Now I’m stuck in this having to read briefs that look like they were written by a law student.

And to the person that responded to that and said "take it easy", well, here you go:

The Court has denied the request for an extension of time so I hope Cozen can get it's act together by tomorrow. HCMC needs to wake up. Jeff Holman needs to wake up. Cozen is asleep. They are not taking this case seriously. They are not drafting forceful papers. All of Cozen's filings are underwhelming.

I cannot wait to hear how this gets spun by the Board into a "settlement strategy."