InvestorsHub Logo

Guido2

08/02/21 6:02 PM

#690816 RE: sortman #690814

Great one-two punch with the opening sentences. You then collapsed. Preferred aren’t the only plaintiffs. Also, why wouldn’t the current commons sue? Why would anyone invest in new offering if the legacy holders were swindled?

whitecorona

08/02/21 6:31 PM

#690819 RE: sortman #690814

While its correct, but not entirely true...

1. Warrants is moot since FnF have OVERPAID.. we are in TAKING situation already.. those whatever 30B+ need to be returned and Sr Warrant CANCELLED since that serve no value (DEBTS have been paid WITH INTEREST!!!)

2. Conversion of Jr Pref to Common is not in prospectus nor serve any value... its complicated to do that since u cant make everyone happy and it serves disadvantage to Common though as overall we are going to win.. but it dilutes unnecessarily.
Only thing I can see the outcome is to buyout Jr Pref separately (thats is the heart of the negotiation .. I think.. I dont think u can meet PAR values but.. good luck ! Perhaps let them settle market price early before RELIST happen so they can convert their Jr Pref to Common BEFORE release & relist per market price as well)

These 2 if they are doing it, then they resolve this deadlock and make housing great again.

Achilles deFlandres

08/02/21 7:00 PM

#690825 RE: sortman #690814

Is there any evidence yet that the lawsuits aren't moot anyway? This entire fiasco has been about possession is 9/10 of the law. Notice that the legal debate has been about everything but the shareholder rights? Bureaucrat Lives Matter. Its a fools errand to go against the Bureaucracy