I agree. They make a very good case for direct claims to proceed. But, I don’t read them as saying derivative claims shouldn’t proceed. Derivative claims have already been approved for trial by Judge Sweeney. Despite what the government may say, the hearing on the 4th is for the appeal filed by direct plaintiffs against the Sweeney ruling. I don’t recall the government appealing the derivative claims ruling.
That’s is why I’m totally 100% SCOTUS gave shareholders more than just a takings case! The opportunity now is to take P’s or commons as the cases move forward it will come clear the standing of claims
Commons and P’s have legal takings P’s have been harmed Commons have been harmed
FHFA is unconstitutional as SCORUS said! Wheels in motion everything is unwinding ...........