some interesting conversation from STW trying to find out, what right or wrong. it seems complicated
DuffelBagChad
@BolliverShagnasty @jmcai273 guys, outside of claim 16, dont we have an assortment of other claims on whats in their servers??
jmcai273
@DuffelBagChad @BolliverShagnasty Yes many. For some reason Claim 16 was isolated out from all the other claims from memory. Don’t have access to much as I am heading out to dinner. Will try and catch up this weekend.
prime311
@DuffelBagChad @BolliverShagnasty @jmcai273 Haven’t had a chance to look yet, but isn’t #16 out of a list of claims, and not pertaining to claim 16 of the patent in particular?
DuffelBagChad
@jmcai273 @DuffelBagChad @BolliverShagnasty tag us if you do. Enjoy and be safe.
Finatic1
@jmcai273 @DuffelBagChad @BolliverShagnasty Claim 16 and 17 on the DDR4. Claim 16 i thought was unchanged but hey u can argue anything in ur defense. Claim 17 was kind of an on again off again patentable claim. Was first denied then recertified and then it appeared to disappear until just recently it was brought back up by Netlist in this case
jmcai273
Mostly exhibits in support of Google trying to knock down Claim 16. Also an expert letter in support of striking Claim 16. All exhibits are pretty much fully redacted.Claim 16 was ordered struck from Claims.
DrEEVIL to @jmcai273
WRONG!!
Jesus Christ dude…
The defendants typed that up just like we typed up the order earlier this week.
NOTHING HAS BEEN SIGNED!
ScoobyDoobyDumping
@jmcai273 @DrEEVIL yea it’s a google prepared template they asked the judge to sign
jmcai273 02:18 AM @ScoobyDoobyDumping @DrEEVIL Got it. That is certainly confusing at first glance.
ScoobyDoobyDumping 02:19 AM @jmcai273 @DrEEVIL have to look at the [proposed] in front of everything