My ideal is to work on staying healthy and stressfree. If I should become sick I'd like to take Brilacidin as a therapy. Until then, I'll go with Ivermectin or Hydroxychloriquine at first sign of disease since both need to be taken early to be effective.
My original thought was to wait a couple of years before considering vaccination, but, as I read more, I've decided to wait until the testing has been done in humans for three years before I'd consider it. Too many unknowns for me at this time. The risk isn't worth it for me since I don't work in a medical setting.
Plus, there are five issues that disturb me greatly.
1. Not FDA approved.
2. Manufacturers are protected from liability
3. Not enough open and free debate in scientific circles.
4. Not enough trust in ANY of the numbers given.
5. Too much strong arming to force it on all, even those in areas without disease.
Message in reply to:
A high viral load, with no symptoms, still means a lot of Delta gets shed in asymptomatic, inoculated people. It’s a new SARS-CoV-delta discovery, and it’s a condition not seen before in vaccines and other CoV variants, so the assumption of shedding is only not understood in its mechanism, not in the creation and production of a “Covid Mary” population infecting unvaccinated people.
If Brilacidin works, then the ideal is vaccinate and treat with B if breakout cases.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
