InvestorsHub Logo

alidare

07/28/21 11:27 PM

#49065 RE: Cynmark24 #49064

Looks like they sold one and got some cash, gold and return of shares from this Chinese company that we talk about in the past, also in process of negotiations/permitting 3 other mines and as previously announced we should hear more about it around September maybe by the time of the exchange launch.

http://mnamexico.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Reporte-Mensual-01-2021-ENG.pdf

PENNY PIRATE

07/28/21 11:52 PM

#49069 RE: Cynmark24 #49064

Cynmark24 ... AABB/AABBG Management has options with the Cash on hand. We have to assume what has been PR'ed to be the Truth IMO, or why be early, just wait for an Audit, Exchange Launch, Mine/s Acquisitions or some other Major Catalyst that is proven to be undeniable. If the Mine/s take longer than the Exchange to be Launched and Tokens sell out from the First Tranche, they could in theory purchase enough gold for a second Tranche release. I know, plenty of possibilities, but the plan appears to be On-Track with recent Developments. We could go over each potential Catalyst and the estimated Time-line, we have enough information already IMO. I think the real issue is an Independent Financial Audit for many, but not for me. I see an Audit after Exchange Launch and Mine/s Acquisition/s, these are the priorities the Management Team is Focused on! I know I'm here now with only a Wallet and some Very Big Catalysts on the way. You can rest assured AABB will have a much higher price to pay with a Financial Audit, Gold Vault Audit, Mine/s Acquisition/s or Live Exchange Launch!

rbtree

07/29/21 1:12 AM

#49080 RE: Cynmark24 #49064

Agreed. That post's premise was illogical---at best

gitreal

07/29/21 1:33 AM

#49081 RE: Cynmark24 #49064

My issue is that if they don't have gold mines, then they lied about it.

EXACTLY! If a company is willing to lie about something as significant as fake gold mines, how can you trust anything it says? We know they fabricated personnel on its website. The Guerrero mine appears to be fake. James Gilbert appears to be fake. The Asian financier appears to be fake. Even the toxic lender appears to be fake or operating under a fake name, at the very least.

As for the toxic convertible note......for a company that was given $34 million by Asian financiers, who needs convertible debt? Or any debt at all...why not go private? Who's to say that the toxic note isn't benefitting the same folks that set this all up? In fact, I would say that is highly likely.