We should start with the very post you linked to. Both you and Pagel are trying to somehow "discredit" me by saying I read what the Apple guy said and that is how I came up with the FACT that the Dell player was a Creative. But if one were to read my post, they would see this:
"Posted by: owd3 In reply to: murgirl who wrote msg# 47071 Date:9/26/2003 9:46:50 AM Post #of 49551
well I know....
I know you folks had your fun with all the wild, groundless speculation yesterday, but seriously, you knew it was a Creative players as soon as you saw the picture from Dell, right?
You guys were continuing the speculation just for fun right? The picture told the story plain as day."
So while I was responding to murgirls post with the quote, the very point of my post was you did not need to read what the Apple guy had to say, the PICTURE was the proof.
If that was to subtle for you, from a different post of mine that same day:
"But by all means, don't take my word for it, even the smallest amount of DD will give you the answer for yourself (even ignoring the Apple guy who stated it WAS a rebadged Creative).'
I even went as far as to post the side by side pics for you. And what were you saying during that time?? Oh, yeah- you made a big deal about the Musicmatch software, right? Then you gave us this gem:
"1) I can't see CREAF giving Dell first rights to a new design (which the DJ obviously is)."
So it seems a little silly to argue over when I was right. Can't we just say I was right again and leave it at that?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
