Replies to post #324991 on Hannover House Inc (HHSE)

[Atown62]

Exactly. The way the ceo loves to use words as pre approved and hopeful, maybe, possible, imminent, ect

Everything is a lie from the blog. Like you said ride the pump and get out

Hhse ceo is a complete piece of shit

[Knobody]

And why would HHSE start that now after 10 years? Looks like you're a little lite on the DD.

[pba]

I disagree with the "same either way" part but no worries. Keep an eye on things and maybe we'll see you again. Cheers

[aCryptoKing]

Are you referring to this:

International partner - buying 150M shares of company in 3 tranches:
50M @ $.03
50M @ $.05
50M @ $.08

Wall Street Journal reports S-1 offering raised, now:
30M @ $.05
30M @ $.08
40M @ $.10

Source: https://www.wsj.com/articles/hannover-house-discloses-structure-of-8-mm-funding-for-myflix-streaming-venture-01623849244?tesla=y

Dilution is NOT the same. There are toxic dilutive actions, notes, debts, etc.. & I'm afraid you are mistaken. They're NOT
'all the same'.

Usually, when a typical OTC Pink dilutes, they raise capital (or use shares to pay debts) at a discount-to-market. Which is
deleterious to shareholders, the value of the company, & the stock price because it invites short interest, increases share
supply, and because OTC's often do so at 60-95% discount! For ex., if you bought 5M shares with your hard-earned money
at $.01 ($50k) you wouldn't want the company giving 150M to someone for $.003 (or less) would you?

That's the difference. That buyer, entity, person, or company is now incentivized to sell those shares directly to market for
a quick profit. And the market in the stock COLLAPSES under that threat, pressure, etc., & only shorts & that entity really
benefit.

Now that is a far cry from what the WSJ reports here. This is an investment to fund by someone who cares about the company
& the stock price. A potential business partner, wealthy shareholder perhaps, an overseas interest who wants an investment,
footprint or foothold in the U.S. maybe? I honestly don't know. But dilution is NOT "all the same".

Furthermore, if you track the daily volume in the stock prior to July 16, & even well before that. The daily volume was around
200,000 shares/day avg. What do you think would happen if a person, company, or entity was trying to acquire ~150M shares
of a company whose average daily volume is around 200k, trading around $.015

And you don't have to think too hard. Just look at the last couple of weeks! Not even half-that amount has traded over the last
6 trading days & the stock is already past $.03. Once again, not all share distributions are the same!

Finally, the last tranche-raise means the CEO & prospective business partner(s) realize there's some fluidity to the S-1 tranche
offerings. There has to be. Which, like an IPO, gets finalized when all the preparations have been finalized & the launch is
close at hand. I personally have no idea & don't know when that is, but from what I can tell, bulls are in control here. And if
it is true that some long-time shareholders have mostly locked up this float, & the absence of corporate dilution continues,
(nevermind short-interest for a moment), then this stock has the potential to go as high as longs decide: aka AMC, BB, GME, BBBY.