Replies to post #22863 on SideChannel Inc (SDCH)

[ProfitsSeeker]

I would absolutely not support that.

[CLOKtickticktick]

After all this company's tumultuous history, shouldn't they show us the new revenue BEFORE asking for the reverse stock split?

And the 'equity incentive program' should only go to employees, not board members that already received large bonuses, handed out for zero sales, right? Exactly what portion do they intend to self-deal to themselves?

I ALSO WONDER: How many actual FULL TIME employees does CLOK have? Is the number less than or greater than two? Or is this entire charade being propped up by a wizard of oz curtain wrapped around the CEO and a whole bunch of nothing?

They are carrying themselves about as if they should all be given the benefit of the doubt, when it is us that should be given the benefit to doubt. But when you doubt and are ignored, it just makes you doubt more.

[ProfitsSeeker]

In my opinion if present management cannot show improvement in the companies finances(sales) with the last money raised from share sale then I think a custodianship should be considered where it will be run as a business. NO MORE COMMON SHARE REVERSE SPLITS. The splits were only good for the company executives in my opinion. There are other ways to raise money if it absolutely is needed.