Agreed - Not being supportive is working against our own best interests. Share holders can express their concerns, but do little more until the next vote.
As to investing in his own company...CytoDyn. I was considering a parallel situation - starting a company of my own. The product is already developed. refined, and highly marketable. The first prototypes are already available and so on. I've invested significantly but would I buy more stock - probably not.
Nader's situation is not exactly the same. He's being accused of all kinds of misdeeds and Not investing - Not buying shares in CytoDyn's. Actually, he IS investing >>> I believe his investment is getting Leronlimab into doctor's hands >> and to that end he is literally investing his life.
Real crooks amass the loot then "bolt." Bernie Madoff didn't flee in time or he'd be sitting in a country that doesn't have an extradition treaty with the US. NOPE, I don't see Nader as a "crook" but as a self-appointed disciple for Leronlimab.
There's also an inference that all the BP members are really "slick", know what they're doing and get everything right...
Think again!
The numerous articles posted here ( that I've assembled into a bibliography) are rife with examples of BP flubbing up. How many billions of dollars have been lost by members of BP on their own worthless trials, dead ends, their own "Prostagenes", etc?
We have lots of company- often losing vast amounts of money time and shareholder confidence in the process.
The ONLY BIG DIFFERENCE IS...
WE HAVE LERONLIMAB>>> AND >>>
IT. WORKS! The Brazilian trials should make that very clear to see.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
