InvestorsHub Logo

nt2innovate

07/10/21 8:32 AM

#173896 RE: Northstar42 #173889

Northstar, fair enough, but can we also get some understanding of what work Pestell completed from about August 2018 when he was hired to June 2019. The question here, is was Nader rushing this protocol to make up for the prior year of lost time. Would the protocol as Pestell requested, have been perfectly reasonable but should have submitted 6 months prior.

Nader is in the wrong here what was Pestell doing all that time in a prerevenue biotech that was starved for funding and where the risk of BK and/or dilution is constant.

daemon57

07/10/21 9:16 AM

#173901 RE: Northstar42 #173889

Northstar42 - the below an excerpt as you mentioned. I haven't been in CYDY for this long but I cant tell you that the lawsuit will have one side of the story (obviously in this scenario the plaintiffs). While the judgement did not go in favor of CYDY (whether it was the right judgement or not, thats moot now) but I don't think you can fairly see both sides of the story by the below.

GLTU/A.

3X Charm

07/10/21 4:17 PM

#173985 RE: Northstar42 #173889

And Pestell is somehow the bad guy for standing up to Nader and trying to protect patients?

Again, an independent party found Nader in the wrong and awarded a damage claim on top of the shares, plus legal fees and costs.