Replies to post #27636 on Bourque Industries Inc (BORK)

[gotmilk]

Where is the image of the so-called Bourque Industries official update ?



First, it's not on the OTC or any other financial website.

Second, it not on Bourque Industries official web site, as follows.
https://kryron2.wixsite.com/bourque

Third, It was not made public by John Bourque on his official Twitter sites.

Lets follow the path of the "Proof" you supplied.

[start]
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164829496
To: gotmilk
From: Spartanfan1
Proof- because you’ll ask for it

$BORK : good to see this....multiple updates starting to roll into #OTC. People forget at one time this was $6.00....they are coming back....no reason this shouldn’t already be back over .03+ pic.twitter.com/VQX21B6Ym1

— ☀️Alex Sunderland☀️ (@SUNNYLAND24) July 9, 2021

[stop]

First,

$BORK : good to see this....multiple updates starting to roll into #OTC. People forget at one time this was $6.00....they are coming back....no reason this shouldn’t already be back over .03+ pic.twitter.com/VQX21B6Ym1

— ☀️Alex Sunderland☀️ (@SUNNYLAND24) July 9, 2021

Looks as if it resides on twitter.com.

But oops, no.

It's a copy of an image located on another web site.

On a subdomain, yes.
Not on any affiliated web site of Bourque Industries or John Bourque .
Not on any financial web site.

It's here.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E538TnoXsAgLx5R?format=jpg&name=large

What is this?

Answer
The pbs.twimg.com subdomain is Twitter's image-hosting domain.
PBS stands for “Photo Blobstore.”
Question: What is Twimg used for?
Answer: “Twimg” stands for “Twitter imaging” and is used to sequester photos and graphics
determined to come from suspicious sources.

So the origin of the image came from suspicious sources.

Once again,
Not from any financial web site.
Not from Bourque Industries official web site.
Not from a Bourque Industries or John Bourque affiliated web site.

Did Bourque Industries (John Bourque) put out this official company information for public viewing ?

Answer: Nope, as in no proof it did.