I've found curiousity and skepticism to be helpful to investing anb that having only blind faith is usually not helpful.
There is a reason he mentioned going after toxic lenders. The implication is not shareholder friendly -- ie if he is worried about toxic lenders, shouldn't we also be?
I hope he succeeds, but I'm not going to go through this with blinders on.
People who did that when VNUE went from $3 to .0002 a share probably wish they hadn't done that. Zach didn't make those people very rich, did he?