InvestorsHub Logo

MelsDollars

07/07/21 9:42 PM

#173463 RE: daemon57 #173460

Sorry to intrude on your echo chamber, but here’s something that refutes all your RTF is Pourhassen’s fault rubbish. Sounds like Patterson dropped the ball to me.

from the SEC link:

"In other words, the RTF Letter resulted from the FDA’s conclusions that the Company’s disclosures and presentations in the BLA were deficient, which was the unforeseen result of certain of the Company’s prior regulatory consultants not performing work consistent with professional standards and their representations, including a third party laboratory’s receptor occupancy analysis. "

3X Charm

07/07/21 10:07 PM

#173475 RE: daemon57 #173460

I am not a lawyer, but I am an expert witness and have testified in well over a hundred cases. Discovery is before trial to see what evidence you possess to implicate yourself in the alleged grievances.

The toll is Not only cost in dollars, but human capital and aggravation. Quite the distraction for a small inexperienced team.

There is plenty of meat on the bone. Check out the SEC filing today in Parallax. Who knows, there may even be enough for SEC to sue Nader like Parallax. That would give even more credibility to the class action cases.

The FDA BOMBSHELL is unprecedented and is pretty damning for CYDY. Check out the SEC Cydy letters posted regarding the 10K. Many provable lies uttered by Nader, including Pro Active Video. He is so dumb he doesn’t remember which lies he has to protect. The BLA RTF lie reveled yesterday may be a big one.

Yes, lawyers may be the ones who win, but CYDY must pay them. It usually costs more to defend than prosecute, but if CYDY a loses they pay Plaintiffs lawyers too. Like in the recent unjust enrichment case. I think the Plaintiffs lawyers get $4million from CYDY.

Anyway it is looked at it is not good news and with every desperate pR and video more lies are uncovered.