“Krisa Management LLC
@KrisaManagement
·
Jul 1
We have pending court actions and negotiations on several of our tickers. We understand that everyone would like updates but we just cannot say anything at the moment. We will update you as soon as we are free to release information.
$AVVH $FBCD $IFAN $GYGC $MDCE“
The grouping together of the court actions and negotiations in the first sentence says to me that each of those actions are effecting the other, they are acting as a group of actions in total to be completed, therefore all of those actions must first be completed for the other sentences to begin to apply all imo. If Avvh and fbcd actions were separated in terms of timeline for info release then there would have been separate sentences or separate tweets addressing each ticker individually imo.
When in theory will they be completely free to release information ? Re-read the first sentence in the tweet, when all of those actions are completed imo. Being free to release information is a general statement in the tweet, which to me means “completely free”, and there is only one way as tweeted for Krisa to become completely free to release information in this instance, which is at least until after July 15, because the court case is preventing them from satisfying the generality of being completely free to release information as was tweeted.
If Krisa wanted to separate the freedom that each tickers specific parameters provided in releasing information the tweet could have said:
“ We will update you as soon as we are free to release information in relation to each company’s specific situation.” Or some verbiage indicating specificity.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
